CarCareTruth Score
Decent, but it's tough on the environment.
Opens Amazon in a new tab. No account needed to look.
Saved to your guest loadout. Sign up to also save to your Cabinet (consumables) or Kit (tools you own).
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Full disclosure
Prices may varyAbout this product's hazards. This product's Safety Data Sheet uses signal word DANGER.Read the manufacturer's SDS and follow all safety instructions before use. CarCareTruth ratings translate the manufacturer's safety sheet. They do not replace the SDS or substitute for a hazard assessment specific to your task.
Health score is for adult use as intended, per the manufacturer's SDS. It does not model child ingestion, accidental spill cleanup, or off-label use. See the safety panel below for full hazard classification, and /disclaimer for the full editorial scope.
GHS hazard codes are quoted from the manufacturer’s Safety Data Sheet. PPE tiers below translate those codes and the listed ingredient chemistry; they are not CarCareTruth recommendations.
Show details for all categories ▾Hide details ▴
Translated from the manufacturer’s Safety Data Sheet, Section 8
SDS §8 specifies imperative eye and face protection: wear safety glasses with side shields, or goggles. The H370/H372 organ-damage classification and H302 oral hazard apply to the same ethylene glycol chemistry that can reach the eyes during a concentrate pour, and eye protection limits that splash exposure.
CarCareTruth publishes the cited sources verbatim and does not advise what action a user should take. Consult the full SDS before use.
Only when: splash risk
Translated from the manufacturer’s Safety Data Sheet, Section 8
SDS §8 specifies protective gloves (neoprene or PVC) where hand contamination is possible during drain or fill work, conditioned on the potential for skin exposure rather than an imperative for all handling. SDS §11 separately notes the mixture may be harmful or irritating in skin contact, but no skin-hazard category is classified in the formal SDS §2 table.
U.S. regulatory standard
29 CFR 1910.132(d); 1910.1200(f)
“The employer shall assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment.”
OSHA standards apply to workplaces. Cited here as the U.S. reference threshold for the underlying hazard class.
CarCareTruth publishes the cited sources verbatim and does not advise what action a user should take. Consult the full SDS before use.
Especially relevant: in enclosed space · hot panels
Translated from the manufacturer’s Safety Data Sheet, Section 2
SDS §11 states vapor exposure has a narcotic effect and may cause headache, fatigue, dizziness, and nausea, and separately names the respiratory system as a target organ under the STOT Cat 1 classification. This is more specific and severe than generic ventilation boilerplate, so the tier is set above the SDS §8 conditional-respirator baseline even though the mixture-level H-codes carry no dedicated inhalation-toxicity code (no H330/H331/H334/H335).
U.S. regulatory standard
29 CFR 1910.134; 1910.138; 1910.1000
“the primary objective shall be to prevent atmospheric contamination… When effective engineering controls are not feasible… appropriate respirators shall be used.”
OSHA standards apply to workplaces. Cited here as the U.S. reference threshold for the underlying hazard class.
CarCareTruth publishes the cited sources verbatim and does not advise what action a user should take. Consult the full SDS before use.
No PPE specified in published sources for ventilation. Absence does not imply “not needed” — consult the full Safety Data Sheet.
PPE tiers translate the manufacturer’s SDS and U.S. regulatory standards. Not professional safety advice. How we report safety.
Scope of these PPE tiers. The tiers on this page translate the product's Safety Data Sheet where one is published, plus its ingredient chemistry, into a comparable rating. They describe a formulation, not a situation: a tier is not a safety determination for any specific user, task, quantity, or environment. The manufacturer's label and use instructions govern how the product is handled. Where the product is used at work, the employer's PPE program and hazard assessment under 29 CFR 1910.132 decide what protection is selected, not this page.
No warranties. CarCareTruth makes no warranties, express or implied, and expressly disclaims the implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose.
This product ranks #17 of 21 in Coolant / Antifreeze.Three above it ↓
Last reviewed August 19, 2026
TL;DR Ford's newer P-OAT coolant for Ford, Lincoln, and Mercury systems calling for spec WSS-M97B57-A1 or WSS-M97B57-A2, a different chemistry from the older Green and Gold lines. Ethylene glycol concentrate with a DANGER signal word from an organ-damage classification, plus the standard swallowing hazard. Keep it secured from pets and children; mix only with distilled water.
Motorcraft VC-13-G is Ford's P-OAT (Phosphated Organic Acid Technology) yellow antifreeze, the organic-acid chemistry that succeeded Ford's older Orange coolant. It meets Ford specifications WSS-M97B57-A1 and WSS-M97B57-A2, the current spec for most Ford, Lincoln, and Mercury vehicles built since 2018. Sold as full-strength concentrate, it mixes 50/50 with distilled water for roughly minus 34 Fahrenheit freeze protection and 265 Fahrenheit boil protection. Ford treats it as compatible with the Orange coolant it replaced.
Right for Ford, Lincoln, and Mercury owners whose manual or fill cap calls for the yellow WSS-M97B57-A1 or WSS-M97B57-A2 coolant, including systems that previously used Orange. Skip it if your vehicle specifies the older conventional Green or the NOAT-based Gold line; Ford's own literature warns against mixing coolant chemistries, and this P-OAT formula is not interchangeable with either.
DANGER signal word, driven by an organ-damage classification affecting the respiratory system, heart, kidneys, and central nervous system, plus the standard harmful-if-swallowed hazard. This product carries a California Prop 65 warning. Wear safety glasses when pouring the concentrate; SDS data describes a narcotic effect from vapor exposure, so ventilate the work area. Collect spent coolant for recycling at an auto parts store.
This is Ford's current yellow coolant meeting Ford specification WSS-M97B57-A1 or WSS-M97B57-A2, the P-OAT (Phosphated Organic Acid Technology) formula used across most Ford, Lincoln, and Mercury vehicles built since roughly 2018. Check your owner's manual or the coolant fill cap before buying, since Ford has used several distinct coolant chemistries across model years and platforms.
Yes. Ford's own service documentation treats yellow WSS-M97B57 coolant as chemically compatible with the older orange WSS-M97B44-D coolant it replaced, and approves using yellow to top off or fully replace a system originally filled with orange. Mixing the two resets the service interval to the shorter orange-coolant schedule rather than the longer yellow one, so a full flush is worth doing if you want the extended interval.
No. This P-OAT formula, the NOAT-based Gold line, and the older conventional green line are three distinct Motorcraft coolant chemistries, and Ford's literature says not to mix or top off a system originally filled with a different coolant line. Use the coolant your specific vehicle was built to take, not whichever Motorcraft bottle is on the shelf.
Yes. This is a full-strength concentrate, not a ready-to-use product. Ford's label and SDS both describe it as requiring dilution with distilled water, typically 50/50, before it goes into the cooling system. Pouring it in neat gives a higher freeze point and worse heat transfer than a properly diluted mix.
The DANGER signal word comes from a Category 1 organ-damage classification, naming the respiratory system, heart, kidneys, and central nervous system, on both single and repeated exposure, tied to the ethylene glycol base. The standard harmful-if-swallowed classification most EG coolants carry also applies, and California's Proposition 65 warning traces to the same ethylene glycol content. This is a real chemistry classification from the manufacturer's own safety data sheet, not marketing language.
The listing for Motorcraft VC-13-G Yellow Concentrated Antifreeze/Coolant carries a California Prop 65 warning. Motorcraft VC-13-G Yellow Concentrated Antifreeze/Coolant is a working automotive fluid rather than a passive part, so the warning points at the formulation itself. The manufacturer's Safety Data Sheet is the primary source for what is in it: the hazard classification and the PPE tiers on this page are translated from that sheet, and the full SDS is linked from the safety panel. California requires the warning whenever exposure to any of roughly 900 listed substances is possible. It does not name which substance applies to a given product, and it states no dose or risk level, so it is not on its own a measure of how hazardous this fluid is in normal use.
Marketing copy from Motorcraft, via Amazon. Not editorial.
Weekly pick
One product, one safety verdict, every week. No spam.

Zerex
G-40 Concentrate Antifreeze/Coolant

BMW
HT-12 Antifreeze/Coolant Concentrate, Green Si-OAT

Evans Cooling Systems
Evans High Performance Waterless Engine Coolant

PEAK
OET Extended Life Orange 50/50 Prediluted Antifreeze/Coolant
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Full disclosure
Community
0 postsShare how you use this product
Drop a quick comment or post a full review with photos and a star rating.
Sign in to postNew here? Create a free account.