Adam's Polishes Interior Detailer (Eucalyptus Mint)

Owner reviews and detailing-forum threads consistently describe a non-greasy satin finish on dash, vinyl, and door-panel plastic. The silicones in the formula are linear grades, which produce a clean matte-to-satin look rather than the wet-shine result associated with older silicone-heavy dressings. No greasy-residue complaints surfaced in surveyed community threads.

The label and Adam's product page claim UV blocking agents and SPF protection against UV rays. However, no named UV absorber compound, no benzophenone derivative, triazine, or UV stabilizer, appears in the safety data sheet's ingredient disclosure. The UV benefit is a label claim; the chemistry has not been disclosed to confirm it.

The safety data sheet lists three Prop 65 substances as trace impurities: ethanol (0.0018%), diethanolamine (sub-ppb), and 1,4-dioxane (sub-ppb). All three are well below California safe harbor thresholds, so no consumer Prop 65 warning is required and the listing carries no Prop 65 flag.

Yes. The safety data sheet (rev. 2024-11-22) reports VOC at 0.0058% by weight (approximately 0.06 g/L), well within CARB limits for interior car-care products. The carrier is water; trace ethanol appears only as a synthesis impurity from the ethoxylated surfactant, not as an alcohol co-solvent.

The product label and Adam's product page name stereos, touch screens, and electronics as intended surfaces. The formula contains no alcohol co-solvent; the trace ethanol is a synthesis impurity, not a carrier. The chemistry is consistent with the screen-safe claim, though individual electronics manufacturers may have their own guidance for screen coatings.