CarCareTruth Score
Mediocre, but it underperforms.
Opens Amazon in a new tab. No account needed to look.
Saved to your guest loadout. Sign up to also save to your Cabinet (consumables) or Kit (tools you own).
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Full disclosure
Prices may varyHealth score is for adult use as intended. No manufacturer SDS is on file, so it is translated from the ingredient chemistry. It does not model child ingestion, accidental spill cleanup, or off-label use. See the safety panel below for full hazard classification, and /disclaimer for the full editorial scope.
No Safety Data Sheet on file.
CarCareTruth has not received a Safety Data Sheet from the manufacturer for this product, so no GHS hazard classification can be cited. The tiers below are cautious defaults — “Beyond SDS” — translated from the product’s ingredient chemistry and how comparable formulations classify, not from a manufacturer hazard classification. Request an SDS from the manufacturer before use.
Show details for all categories ▾Hide details ▴
Only when: when spraying
Beyond SDS: translated from the ingredient chemistry
No SDS classification is available. As a trigger-spray applied toward a tilted windshield, mist at eye level is the plausible contact pathway; eye protection is prudent during overhead spraying until a formula is confirmed.
No Safety Data Sheet is on file for this product. The tier above is a cautious default translated from the ingredient chemistry, not a cited manufacturer classification. Request an SDS from the manufacturer before use.
No PPE specified in published sources for skin. Absence does not imply “not needed” — no Safety Data Sheet is on file, so request one from the manufacturer before use.
Only when: in enclosed space
Beyond SDS: translated from the ingredient chemistry
No SDS inhalation classification is available. The undisclosed solvent could generate vapor during spraying; the plausible concern is limited to enclosed-space application, since deicers are normally used outdoors with natural ventilation.
No Safety Data Sheet is on file for this product. The tier above is a cautious default translated from the ingredient chemistry, not a cited manufacturer classification. Request an SDS from the manufacturer before use.
No PPE specified in published sources for ventilation. Absence does not imply “not needed” — no Safety Data Sheet is on file, so request one from the manufacturer before use.
PPE tiers here are cautious defaults translated from the product’s ingredient chemistry — no manufacturer SDS is on file to cite. Not professional safety advice. How we report safety.
Scope of these PPE tiers. The tiers on this page translate the product's Safety Data Sheet where one is published, plus its ingredient chemistry, into a comparable rating. They describe a formulation, not a situation: a tier is not a safety determination for any specific user, task, quantity, or environment. The manufacturer's label and use instructions govern how the product is handled. Where the product is used at work, the employer's PPE program and hazard assessment under 29 CFR 1910.132 decide what protection is selected, not this page.
No warranties. CarCareTruth makes no warranties, express or implied, and expressly disclaims the implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose.
This product ranks #10 of 10 in Deicer / Frost Spray.Three above it ↓
Last reviewed July 6, 2026
TL;DR Cold-weather ice melting is the most-cited weakness in owner reviews, the majority of ratings are negative, and there is no independent evidence it clears ice at the temperatures where a deicer matters. The 60ml two-pack is about 4 oz total, the smallest in the category, and owners report the bottles empty quickly. No SDS or ingredient list is published, so the formula is unverified and health is scored at the no-SDS floor.
A small trigger-spray marketed as a windshield deicing agent, sold in a 60ml two-pack that comes to roughly 4 oz total. Owner ratings skew heavily negative: weak cold-weather ice melting is the dominant complaint across reviews, and the majority of ratings are negative. The active ingredient is not disclosed, so freeze-point performance cannot be confirmed from chemistry. Coverage is the standout problem, as the bottles are far smaller than the listing images suggest and owners report they run out in a handful of sprays, the worst per-use economy in the category.
There is no strong buyer case here. Cold-climate owners report it does not reliably melt ice, and the tiny two-pack runs out fast, making per-use cost the highest in the category. Anyone who parks outside in a real winter should choose a larger, established isopropyl-alcohol deicer with confirmed cold-weather reviews and a published safety data sheet.
No safety data sheet could be located, and iekufes publishes no ingredient list, so the health score of 5.0 reflects absent data rather than a confirmed hazard. Because the formula is undisclosed, VOC content, biodegradability, and any salt or solvent chemistry cannot be verified, so the environment score sits at the category base with no adjustments.
No. iekufes is an Amazon-only seller with no brand website or regulatory page, and no SDS or ingredient panel could be located as of July 2026. The active ingredient is undisclosed, so it is not confirmed to be isopropyl alcohol, methanol, or a salt. Because the formula is unverified, the health score is set to the 5.0 no-SDS floor, which reflects absent data rather than a confirmed hazard.
The pack is two 60ml bottles, about 120ml or roughly 4 oz total. The listing images make the bottles look larger than they are; owners consistently describe them as very small and report they empty in a few sprays. That works out to a high cost per use compared with a standard 16 to 32 oz deicer bottle, and it is the smallest total volume in the category.
Community evidence says not reliably. Cold-weather ice melting is the most-cited weakness across owner reviews, and reviews are predominantly negative. There is no independent cold-climate evidence confirming it works at the low temperatures where a deicer matters most, and the undisclosed formula gives no chemistry basis to expect otherwise.
Unconfirmed. With no ingredient disclosure and no SDS, the formula cannot be verified as safe for automotive surfaces, so surface safety is scored conservatively. Streaking on glass after use is a recurring theme in owner reviews. An established isopropyl-alcohol deicer with a published SDS is a safer choice if surface compatibility matters to you.
Marketing copy from iekufes, via Amazon. Not editorial.
Weekly pick
One product, one safety verdict, every week. No spam.
CarPlan
Blue Star De-Icer Spray
nextzett
Eistau De-Icer Spray
Polar Specialist Coatings
Polar De-Icer Spray
Prestone
AS247 Trigger Spray Windshield De-Icer
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Full disclosure
Community
0 postsShare how you use this product
Drop a quick comment or post a full review with photos and a star rating.
Sign in to postNew here? Create a free account.