CarCareTruth Score
Decent.
Opens Amazon in a new tab. No account needed to look.
Saved to your guest loadout. Sign up to also save to your Cabinet (consumables) or Kit (tools you own).
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Full disclosure
Prices may varyHealth score is for adult use as intended. No manufacturer SDS is on file, so it is translated from the ingredient chemistry. It does not model child ingestion, accidental spill cleanup, or off-label use. See the safety panel below for full hazard classification, and /disclaimer for the full editorial scope.
No Safety Data Sheet on file.
CarCareTruth has not received a Safety Data Sheet from the manufacturer for this product, so no GHS hazard classification can be cited. The tiers below are cautious defaults — “Beyond SDS” — translated from the product’s ingredient chemistry and how comparable formulations classify, not from a manufacturer hazard classification. Request an SDS from the manufacturer before use.
Show details for all categories ▾Hide details ▴
Only when: when spraying
Beyond SDS: translated from the ingredient chemistry
No SDS classification is available. As a trigger-spray applied toward a tilted windshield, mist at eye level is the plausible contact pathway; eye protection is prudent during overhead spraying until a formula is confirmed.
No Safety Data Sheet is on file for this product. The tier above is a cautious default translated from the ingredient chemistry, not a cited manufacturer classification. Request an SDS from the manufacturer before use.
No PPE specified in published sources for skin. Absence does not imply “not needed” — no Safety Data Sheet is on file, so request one from the manufacturer before use.
Only when: in enclosed space
Beyond SDS: translated from the ingredient chemistry
No SDS inhalation classification is available. The undisclosed solvent could generate vapor during spraying; the plausible concern is limited to enclosed-space application, since deicers are normally used outdoors with natural ventilation.
No Safety Data Sheet is on file for this product. The tier above is a cautious default translated from the ingredient chemistry, not a cited manufacturer classification. Request an SDS from the manufacturer before use.
No PPE specified in published sources for ventilation. Absence does not imply “not needed” — no Safety Data Sheet is on file, so request one from the manufacturer before use.
PPE tiers here are cautious defaults translated from the product’s ingredient chemistry — no manufacturer SDS is on file to cite. Not professional safety advice. How we report safety.
Scope of these PPE tiers. The tiers on this page translate the product's Safety Data Sheet where one is published, plus its ingredient chemistry, into a comparable rating. They describe a formulation, not a situation: a tier is not a safety determination for any specific user, task, quantity, or environment. The manufacturer's label and use instructions govern how the product is handled. Where the product is used at work, the employer's PPE program and hazard assessment under 29 CFR 1910.132 decide what protection is selected, not this page.
No warranties. CarCareTruth makes no warranties, express or implied, and expressly disclaims the implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose.
This product ranks #5 of 9 in Deicer / Frost Spray.Three above it ↓
Last reviewed July 6, 2026
TL;DR A popular water-based trigger-spray deicer sold as a four-pack, but its cold-weather floor is unproven: no independent northern-climate reviews confirm sub-zero performance, and a water-based formula with an undisclosed solvent risks freezing in extreme cold. No SDS or ingredient concentrations are published, so health is scored at the no-SDS floor. It is also expensive per ounce.
A water-based trigger spray marketed as a no-scraping way to clear ice and frost from glass, mirrors, and door locks. It has strong market presence and is generally well-rated, but the reviews do not tie performance to real cold-climate temperatures, so its sub-zero reliability is unproven. Because it is water-based with an undisclosed solvent and no stated alcohol concentration, the freeze-point floor cannot be confirmed and a water-heavy deicer can freeze in extreme cold. As a non-pressurized spray it avoids aerosol flammability, and no surface-damage pattern shows up across its owner base.
A reasonable pick for milder-winter drivers dealing with occasional frost and light ice who value a familiar, widely-sold spray. Anyone who parks outside in a real northern winter should choose an established isopropyl-alcohol deicer with confirmed cold-climate reviews and a published safety data sheet, giving a verified low-temperature floor this product cannot claim. Note the high per-ounce cost of the four-pack.
No safety data sheet could be located, and neither EZR nor its contract manufacturer publishes ingredient concentrations, so the 5.0 health score reflects absent data rather than a confirmed hazard. The bottle label carries only a generic caution, no GHS signal word or Prop 65 warning. With the formula undisclosed, VOC content, biodegradability, and solvent chemistry cannot be verified, so environment sits at the category base with no adjustments.
No. EZR is a private-label brand made by contract manufacturer Concept Laboratories, and no SDS or ingredient concentration panel could be located as of July 2026. The bottle label lists only 'Water, Solvent, Viscosity increase Agents, Colorants,' with the active solvent unnamed. Because the formula is unverified, the health score is set to the 5.0 no-SDS floor, which reflects absent data rather than a confirmed hazard.
It is popular and generally well-rated by owners, but there is no independent cold-climate evidence confirming performance at the sub-zero temperatures where a deicer matters most. It is a water-based formula with an undisclosed solvent and no stated alcohol concentration, so its freeze-point floor cannot be confirmed. Both deicing speed and low-temperature effectiveness are scored conservatively for that reason.
No paint, seal, or trim damage pattern shows up across the product's large owner-review base, and it is water-based rather than a road-salt formula, which is a good sign. But with no published SDS and no ingredient concentrations, surface safety cannot be positively confirmed, so it is scored at the middle of the range rather than as proven-safe.
It is on the expensive side for the category. The four-pack holds only about 68 oz across four small 17 oz bottles, and owners consistently report the bottles empty quickly, so per use it runs well above mainstream single-bottle deicers. If you want ice-clearing volume for the money, a larger single bottle from an established brand with a published SDS is usually the better buy.
Marketing copy from EZR, via Amazon. Not editorial.
Weekly pick
One product, one safety verdict, every week. No spam.
CarPlan
Blue Star De-Icer Spray
nextzett
Eistau De-Icer Spray
Polar Specialist Coatings
Polar De-Icer Spray
Prestone
AS247 Trigger Spray Windshield De-Icer
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Full disclosure
Community
0 postsShare how you use this product
Drop a quick comment or post a full review with photos and a star rating.
Sign in to postNew here? Create a free account.