BISSELL PRO OXY Spot & Stain Portable Machine Formula

Translated from the manufacturer’s Safety Data Sheet, Section 2

H320 (Eye Irritant Cat 2B) is present in SDS §2 mixture classification, even though SDS §8 affirmatively states no eye protection is required. Because H320 is a real eye-irritant hazard code, the tier is held at situational rather than dropped to not_needed · the health score itself treats the eye-contact pathway as real via a non-zeroable -0.5 deduction. Situational with trigger splash_risk covers pouring the RTU formula into the extractor's tank.

U.S. regulatory standard

29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1)

“appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from… liquid chemicals…”

ANSI Z87.1 (incorporated via §1910.6)

OSHA standards apply to workplaces. Cited here as the U.S. reference threshold for the underlying hazard class.

UN GHS hazard statement

“Causes eye irritation”

UN GHS Rev. 9 (2021)

Translated from the manufacturer’s Safety Data Sheet, Section 8

SDS §8 names protective gloves and states they are 'Not required under conditions of use.' Section 11 confirms the formula is not a primary dermal irritant (rabbit), and Section 2 carries no H315/H317/H314 skin code. Held at situational (prolonged_or_repeated) rather than omitted or not_needed, since §8 names the control and any glove boilerplate must surface as at least a situational row.

Beyond SDS: translated from the ingredient chemistry

No H335 or inhalation H-codes in SDS §2. Situational with enclosed_space trigger applies because hot-water extraction inside a vehicle cabin generates steam that may carry trace surfactant mist. SDS §8 states respiratory protection 'Not required under conditions of use'; the enclosed_space trigger is a delivery-mechanism concern, not a chemistry-driven deduction.